- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:22:13 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27076 Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard| |affects_validator --- Comment #4 from Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> --- (In reply to alexander surkov from comment #1) > it's not backward > compatible change and will regress people who doesn't misuse it so perhaps > it's safer to introduce new attribute. (In reply to steve faulkner from comment #3 > (In reply to Marco Zehe from comment #2) > > As I write above, I don't know of any site which uses tabIndex with a > > positive integer value correctly. On the contrary, all support/advice > > inquiries I get have to do with the fact that it is being misused, primarily > > due to lack of awareness. > > I will grep some HTML data and see what examples I come up with. Yeah it would help a lot to have some hard data about it, and an analysis of that data. (In reply to Marco Zehe from comment #2) > On the contrary, all support/advice > inquiries I get have to do with the fact that it is being misused, primarily > due to lack of awareness. Short of making values other than 0 or -1 invalid, another option for raising awareness would be: 1. In http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/editing.html#attr-tabindex change the statement about the allowed value of tabindex to read something like, "The tabindex attribute, if specified, should have a value of either 0 or -1. The value must otherwise be a valid integer. However, values other than 0 or -1 are considered _obsolete but conforming_." 2. In http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/obsolete.html#obsolete-but-conforming-features add the statement, "The tabindex attribute is fully conforming but authors should not specify values for it other than 0 or -1." 3. The validator is updated to emit a warning (not error) message about any tabindex value other than 0 or -1.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2014 22:22:14 UTC