- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:16:31 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25434 --- Comment #11 from Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> --- (In reply to niels t from comment #7) > > To Mark's points: ... > 3) Not sure what the old model is. It does not have a basis for > interoperability that we want to achieve. If it’s plugins, > they are allowing direct communication and are widely used. > At any time since the introduction of the HTML Video Element, web browser implementors could have chosen to integrate DRMs without modification of the HTMLVideoElement API, with the DRM having direct network access to communicate with the license server. So far, they have chosen not to, but they could still do this with no reference to EME. The EME effort is specifically aimed at determining what constraints need to be applied to DRMs in order to convince web browsers to integrate them. This model, as originally proposed [1] (3.5 years ago), with all application-related communication mediated by the application, is proving empirically successful. In fact, millions of desktop browsers users are already using it. The direct communication model has manifestly failed for desktop web browsers. [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/11/web-and-tv/slides/netflix.pdf, particularly slides 10 and 12. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2014 18:16:33 UTC