- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:44:17 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27307 --- Comment #1 from Bob Lund <b.lund@cablelabs.com> --- (In reply to Bob Lund from comment #0) > Bug 26921 [1] proposed setting the track id so that the id would be unique > across periods. In comment 2 of that bug is was agreed to set the id to the > tuple ("Period@id","AdaptationSet@id"[,"ContentComponent@id"]). This change > didn't make it into the PR that closed bug 26921. > > This change still needs to be done. > > > [1] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26921 Thinking some more about this bug, why does the application need the HTML track id have to contain the id of the current Period? Why can't the HTML track id be the media resource track id? Seems like only one Period is active at a time and media resources require track ids to be unique. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2014 21:44:19 UTC