- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:43:38 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27292 --- Comment #3 from Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com <mtanalin@yandex.ru> --- (In reply to comment #2) > Your example is quite good and I wanted to build something similar. But the > problem is that clicking on link actually prevents the change of state > (checked/unchecked) of the control itself. This is not a problem since clicking the link makes the corresponding page to load which is what user intended to do. It does not matter at all if the checkbox on the previous page has remained unchecked. > You would achieve more > correct results, even at the cost of duplicating text inside the page, if > you keep the navigation and the check controls separated (e.g. a navigation > column and a newsletter subscription form). Results are already correct. There is no a newsletter subscription form in my example. This is a form to view events of some type or types on a real-world website I've developed some time ago. If a single category is what user want, he just clicks the corresponding link while, to filter events by multiple categories, user may use corresponding checkboxes and submit button. Duplicating things (especially just for the purpose of pure theory) is evil almost always. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 16:43:40 UTC