- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 19:25:19 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27283 Bug ID: 27283 Summary: InvalidAccessError usage is questionable; use TypeError instead? Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Encrypted Media Extensions Assignee: adrianba@microsoft.com Reporter: d@domenic.me QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-media@w3.org "If keySystem is an empty string, return a promise rejected with a new DOMException whose name is InvalidAccessError. If supportedConfigurations was provided and is empty, return a promise rejected with a new DOMException whose name is InvalidAccessError." In general TypeErrors are preferred for invalid arguments. I think in general the existence of InvalidAccessError is a mistake from the days before it was realized that IDL was not a language-agnostic layer. (I will file a WebIDL bug to discuss.) No big deal though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 8 November 2014 19:25:21 UTC