- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 17:54:20 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27269 --- Comment #3 from Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> --- (In reply to Glenn Adams from comment #1) > I oppose adoption of this proposal due since it would dictate policy for the > use of EME, which IMO is the prerogative of users of EME, and not the EME > specification. In other words, I believe EME should restrict itself to > defining mechanism, and not policy. If it is desirable to define a normative > policy or set of policies that can be optionally adopted for standardized > uses by some EME user, then such policy(ies) may be defined in a separate > document and adopted (or not) by EME users as they see fit. Some things are matters of policy for the sites using EME or for keysystem providers, but other things are matters of what the User Agent exposes to the web in general, including to sites that are not using EME for its intended purpose and/or are not even licensees of any keysystem. This and the other bugs raised by Henri are not black-and-white in terms of whether they address only policies which are properly the domain of sites and keysystem vendors or whether they address questions of policy for the web platform in general. For example, it would be inappropriate to introduce functions with new properties which undermine the body of previous work aimed at giving the web platform as a whole improved privacy properties. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 17:54:21 UTC