- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 21:22:46 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27253 Bug ID: 27253 Summary: Confusions involving Universal Time and old time stamps Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: HTML5 spec Assignee: dave.null@w3.org Reporter: eggert@cs.ucla.edu QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-admin@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org Created attachment 1534 --> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=1534&action=edit Fix some confusions involving Universal Time and old time stamps. The HTML5 spec requires UT1 for pre-UTC time stamps, but in practice UT2 was the basis of civil timekeeping just before UTC was inaugurated, and UT0 is a better choice than UT1 if you go back far enough. But the main point is that the HTML standard shouldn't try to impose a "must" time standard here (UT1 vs UT2 vs whatever) when this doesn't correspond to common practice. Instead, the standard should simply call out Universal Time as a general term. A proposed patch is attached. Some other minor changes for this edit: * Change a couple of "must"s to "should"s when "must" is too strong. * Mention that UT is mean solar time, not solar time. * Don't require actual observations at Greenwich for old time stamps -- if you go back far enough, nobody was at Greenwich to observe anything. My source for UT2 being the basis of civil timekeeping just before UTC is the following email from Steve Allen of UCO/Lick Observatory: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2014-November/021867.html He cites the Bulletin Horaire of the Bureau International de l'Heure, March-April 1960, which is archived here: https://plus.google.com/photos/112320138481375234766/albums/6078225731350227361 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2014 21:22:51 UTC