- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 17:16:09 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25923 David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ddorwin@google.com --- Comment #1 from David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> --- isTypeSupported() is intended to allow applications use multiple calls to quickly and systematically find a supported key system and media combination. I'm not sure how that would work if it was asynchronous. Is isTypeSupported() a good time to prompt the user? Applications are likely to call it multiple times for various key systems and media types. There might be other advantages to it being asynchronous and supporting prompts (i.e. preventing abuse of the information), but I'm not sure how to address the issues above, at least with the current design. Maybe a constraints/capabilities-based design would address this by allowing an application to provide all its supported configurations and get a response in one call. For the specific scenario in comment #0, how about returning "maybe" from isTypeSupported() and waiting for MediaKeys.create() to prompt? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 30 May 2014 17:16:11 UTC