- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 04:33:39 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24997 --- Comment #12 from Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Bob Lund from comment #10) > (In reply to Bob Lund from comment #7) > > (In reply to Bob Lund from comment #6) > > > (In reply to Silvia Pfeiffer from comment #5) > > > > I have prepared a patch for this in a branch at > > > > https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/f91c1932220ab4272d2b2b4e6c9f3679251fefa1 . > > > > > > > > Could you please check that this is all correct, in particular for MPEG-2, > > > > MPEG-4 and DASH (I checked Ogg and WebM and am quite confident on those). > > > > > > For MPEG-4 metadata text track, you've used a list of sample entry codes > > > instead of 'meta' handler type. Beyond, 'mett' and 'metx', I do not know if > > > this list is accurate or not. > > > > > > The table for setting text track kind, label and language looks good. > > > > While the phrase "contain private sections ("payload_unit_start_indicator" > > == 1)" for identifying an MPEG-2 TS metadata text track is technically > > correct, it requires the UA to wait for private section before creating the > > text track. > > > > It might be more simple for the UA to create a metadata text track for > > MPEG-2 TS stream_type 0x05, 0x80 - 0xff without waiting for a private > > section indicated by a payload_unit_start_indicator == 1. If none are ever > > received, no private section cues would ever be created. > > I think the UA should create the metadata text track for these stream_types > and NOT wait for packets to determine the payload_unit_start_indicator; > script will know what to expect. > > So, the specific change is at line 33161 in > https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/f91c1932220ab4272d2b2b4e6c9f3679251fefa1. > Drop the text "contain private sections ("payload_unit_start_indicator" == > 1)" OK, fixed: https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/bdb060f7c6a3836ef04e91d291cc50b8c63b8f10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 24 March 2014 04:33:57 UTC