- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 11:28:03 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24997 --- Comment #9 from Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Bob Lund from comment #6) > For MPEG-4 metadata text track, you've used a list of sample entry codes > instead of 'meta' handler type. Beyond, 'mett' and 'metx', I do not know if > this list is accurate or not. I went through the list at https://www.w3.org/community/inbandtracks/wiki/Main_Page#ISOBMFF_2 and picked all those that were marked as "TextTrack". This is about how to identify that a track is indeed a text track, so if that's wrong, let me know what else I should write. > For MPEG-2 TS there are many many non-audio/video stream types beyond those > explicitly identified as metadata (0x05, 0x80 - 0xff), with no identified > use case for exposing them to script. If these are not sufficient, can you please let me know how to identify a text track of kind @metadata in MPEG-2 TS. > For MPEG-4, it seems that all metadata tracks would be identified by a > handler type of 'meta'. Is there a use case where that is not so? That's what the patch says, too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2014 11:28:04 UTC