- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 10:52:07 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26109 steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> --- (In reply to James Nurthen from comment #0) > The sentence says > "If the content and interaction is only supported in a scripting-enabled > browsing context, i.e. Google docs (its applications require JavaScript > enabled to work), it is not safe to include the ARIA markup inline." > > If the application relies on scripting then it is safe to include ARIA > markup inline OR via scripting. > > This sentence states that in this case you cannot add ARIA inline which is > incorrect. Please remove the not so this reads > > "If the content and interaction is only supported in a scripting-enabled > browsing context, i.e. Google docs (its applications require JavaScript > enabled to work), it is safe to include the ARIA markup inline." I have modified the text commit https://github.com/w3c/aria-in-html/commit/488534666dcc7ce32524e4ad4a03f11240d9fd7e please review, and re-open if needed http://w3c.github.io/aria-in-html/#add-aria-inline-or-via-script -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 22 June 2014 10:52:08 UTC