- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 10:52:07 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26109
steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to James Nurthen from comment #0)
> The sentence says
> "If the content and interaction is only supported in a scripting-enabled
> browsing context, i.e. Google docs (its applications require JavaScript
> enabled to work), it is not safe to include the ARIA markup inline."
>
> If the application relies on scripting then it is safe to include ARIA
> markup inline OR via scripting.
>
> This sentence states that in this case you cannot add ARIA inline which is
> incorrect. Please remove the not so this reads
>
> "If the content and interaction is only supported in a scripting-enabled
> browsing context, i.e. Google docs (its applications require JavaScript
> enabled to work), it is safe to include the ARIA markup inline."
I have modified the text
commit
https://github.com/w3c/aria-in-html/commit/488534666dcc7ce32524e4ad4a03f11240d9fd7e
please review, and re-open if needed
http://w3c.github.io/aria-in-html/#add-aria-inline-or-via-script
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 22 June 2014 10:52:08 UTC