- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 22:20:42 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25594 --- Comment #4 from David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> --- (In reply to Anne from comment #3) > The pattern we try to advocate people to use for now is return an object (as > IDL does not allow returning a sequence) and define in prose that you return > a JavaScript Array Object that represents a snapshot of the underlying data. > Whenever you update the underlying data, you also need to create a fresh > snapshot object. > > So you end up with two variables (underlying data, Array object) and an > update algorithm. Are you saying that the following is the recommended style? object getUsableKeyIds(); Is that preferred to asynchronously looking up the data only when queried? For example: Promise<object> getUsableKeyIds(); where the promise is resolved with an object that is a JavaScript Array Object that represents a snapshot of the underlying data. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2014 22:20:44 UTC