[Bug 26424] Tag omission rules for rp could break invalid-but-existing content

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26424

William Chen <wchen@mozilla.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |wchen@mozilla.com

--- Comment #2 from William Chen <wchen@mozilla.com> ---
I took a quick look at some usages of <rp> on the web and it didn't take long
to find a few pages that use <rp> inside of <rt> (it doesn't help that one of
these was a ruby tutorial), and also a page that looks like it was written to
take advantage of auto-closing because it didn't use close tags.

I didn't investigate to see how different things get rendered if we changed the
parsing rules, but I suspect that making <rp> auto-close nothing will probably
cause some comparability issues.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 25 July 2014 18:44:02 UTC