[Bug 26345] [MSE] order of activeSourceBuffers underspecified

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26345

Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |acolwell@google.com

--- Comment #1 from Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com> ---
Why does order matter here? I don't particulary object to mandating that the
order match sourceBuffers, but I don't really understand why it matters. Won't
the application always have to manually inspect the lists if
sourceBuffers.length != activeSourceBuffers.length? Why let the application
treat the == case differently?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 24 July 2014 17:46:58 UTC