- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:34:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26417
Bug ID: 26417
Summary: i18n-ISSUE-343: Type attribute on ol
Product: HTML.next
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: default
Assignee: dave.null@w3.org
Reporter: www-international@w3.org
QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, robin@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/grouping-content.html#the-ol-element
4.4.5 The ol element
The type attribute seems to be a presentational device that ought to be
replaced by CSS, especially given that all major browsers support the styles
described when they are specified by use of list-style-type (see
http://www.w3.org/International/tests/repository/css3-counter-styles/predefined-styles/results-cstyles#simplenumeric
for the roman styles). If it is truly presentational, perhaps we should
deprecate it.
Or is this intentionally kept as a way to allow a minimal set of 'semantically'
differentiated lists, that will work if CSS is not present? If so, perhaps we
should add a brief note to explain that, and mention that you can do much more
using CSS.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2014 13:34:22 UTC