- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:34:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26417 Bug ID: 26417 Summary: i18n-ISSUE-343: Type attribute on ol Product: HTML.next Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: default Assignee: dave.null@w3.org Reporter: www-international@w3.org QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, robin@w3.org http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/grouping-content.html#the-ol-element 4.4.5 The ol element The type attribute seems to be a presentational device that ought to be replaced by CSS, especially given that all major browsers support the styles described when they are specified by use of list-style-type (see http://www.w3.org/International/tests/repository/css3-counter-styles/predefined-styles/results-cstyles#simplenumeric for the roman styles). If it is truly presentational, perhaps we should deprecate it. Or is this intentionally kept as a way to allow a minimal set of 'semantically' differentiated lists, that will work if CSS is not present? If so, perhaps we should add a brief note to explain that, and mention that you can do much more using CSS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2014 13:34:22 UTC