- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:50:45 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13108 --- Comment #9 from David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> --- Note that U+200B; can be accessed as ​ or ​ already so adding &zwsp; as an alias for that isn't really adding any new functionality even if it were added then the the fallback on legacy systems that don't define it is sufficiently bad (printing "&zwsp;" in html or making the entire document be ill formed in XML) that the advice to users would be to use one of the existing forms. Thus my preference would be not to add a name (we have only added one name since 1998) but as I said in comment #2 if the consensus is to add it I would of course update unicode.xml so it worked its way into mathml and html and the xml entities specs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2014 15:50:49 UTC