- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:17:37 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25733 Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |robin@w3.org --- Comment #7 from Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> --- (In reply to Philippe Le Hegaret from comment #6) > As long as The Group is fine with making informative statements and having > the informative reference, we're fine. My understanding is that there is no objection to this. > As a side note, publishing the registry in the dated space of W3C isn't > ideal since it doesn't take the update automatic. I'm open to alternative > approaches on that front. I'm not sure what you mean by making the update automatic. Do you mean making it so that the editors can write there? Unless I'm mistaken, that's in fact possible — or at least we used to do it. Alternatively, these could also be on dev.w3, dvcs.w3, etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 10:17:38 UTC