- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 15:06:31 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26251
steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Rich Schwerdtfeger from comment #0)
> It is not clear that the table embedded in the table is unaffected by the
> role of presentation being applied to the containing table. Also, it should
> be platform agnostic and look more like a DOM tree even though it is an
> accessible object tree. This way a web author can see how applying
> role="presentation" removes objects from the accessibility tree.
>
> So, I would recommend putting the DOM tree on the left with the role
> attributes. On the right I would have an accessible object tree, with the
> roles on the objects, that looks like the DOM tree but without the objects
> removed due to role="presentation applied"
>
> See the figure from DOM 1:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-DOM-Level-1/introduction.html
>
> This allows the author to see a comparison of how the DOM tree and the now
> slimmed down accessibility apply. This is also platform agnostic
> (accessibility API independent) and looks like something the author is
> familiar with.
Hi Rich I have updated the example(s) in question to make it clearer, I have
not yet modified the representation style of the acc tree, will look into this.
http://w3c.github.io/aria-in-html/#use-of-role-presentation
please have a look.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 13 July 2014 15:06:32 UTC