- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 15:06:31 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26251 steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Rich Schwerdtfeger from comment #0) > It is not clear that the table embedded in the table is unaffected by the > role of presentation being applied to the containing table. Also, it should > be platform agnostic and look more like a DOM tree even though it is an > accessible object tree. This way a web author can see how applying > role="presentation" removes objects from the accessibility tree. > > So, I would recommend putting the DOM tree on the left with the role > attributes. On the right I would have an accessible object tree, with the > roles on the objects, that looks like the DOM tree but without the objects > removed due to role="presentation applied" > > See the figure from DOM 1: > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-DOM-Level-1/introduction.html > > This allows the author to see a comparison of how the DOM tree and the now > slimmed down accessibility apply. This is also platform agnostic > (accessibility API independent) and looks like something the author is > familiar with. Hi Rich I have updated the example(s) in question to make it clearer, I have not yet modified the representation style of the acc tree, will look into this. http://w3c.github.io/aria-in-html/#use-of-role-presentation please have a look. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 13 July 2014 15:06:32 UTC