- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 21:22:01 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18515 --- Comment #34 from Jerry Smith <jdsmith@microsoft.com> --- It seems that either approach could work. I prefer the WaitingFor option because it seems more direct and intuitive than using promises to reflect state. Perhaps the issue of extending an already in use waiting event might be a decisive factor. For me, extending the existing event is a positive. Do others believe it will present problems during EME adoption? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2014 21:22:03 UTC