- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:32:59 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24027 --- Comment #3 from David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> --- I like this simple format for the Data portion of the PSSH box. I filed bug 24419 to define a license request format for Clear Key so apps don't need to parse a PSSH box. One question for the group: Does it make sense to support specifying multiple key IDs in the PSSH or should we just rely on the server to translate one to N (i.e audio and video keys)? I believe some commercial protection systems do former; are there any that do the latter? The Clear Key license format will support multiple key ID-key pairs. Clear Key and this PSSH format should be capable of anything (reasonable within the context of EME/browsers) that commercial key systems support. This thread questioning the need for system-specific PSSH boxes includes some analysis of some existing PSSH formats: * http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2013May/0017.html * http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2013May/0018.html * http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2013May/0025.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 04:33:01 UTC