- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:53:02 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13814 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> --- (In reply to Leif Halvard Silli from comment #2) > > This rationale does not count in the use case that the image map is a > navigation menu. In that case, there will be a symbol or text inside the > image map image, which e.g. the sighted user will see, whereas e.g. the AT > user will not see it but could get the text from the area element that does > not create a hyperlink. > > In navigation menus, it is freequently the case that the link is "dead" if > it leads to the current page. The point is that an <area> element with no href="" attribute just won't be listed, per the current spec. So making alt="" valid for such elements would be a waste of time. If you want to change the model, that's a different bug. (But probably also a WONTFIX.) (In reply to Leif Halvard Silli from comment #3) > By the way, in Firefox, the <area> elements are included in the tabbing > order even if the element lacks both @alt and @href. That's a bug. Please file it with Mozilla. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 13 January 2014 23:53:03 UTC