- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 22:19:38 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13814 Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-i | |ua.no Resolution|WONTFIX |--- --- Comment #2 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> --- (In reply to Ian 'Hixie' Hickson from comment #1) > Status: Rejected > Change Description: no spec change > Rationale: You'd never be able to see the text (areas that can't be > activated don't get exposed), so this is unnecessary. This rationale does not count in the use case that the image map is a navigation menu. In that case, there will be a symbol or text inside the image map image, which e.g. the sighted user will see, whereas e.g. the AT user will not see it but could get the text from the area element that does not create a hyperlink. In navigation menus, it is freequently the case that the link is "dead" if it leads to the current page. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 11 January 2014 22:19:39 UTC