- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 01:22:24 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25371
Jason Kiss <jason@accesscult.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason@accesscult.org
Assignee|faulkner.steve@gmail.com |jason@accesscult.org
--- Comment #3 from Jason Kiss <jason@accesscult.org> ---
Does @title on <abbr> define a text alternative? If so, then based on the
updated text alternative computation [1], shouldn't the correct accessible name
for the text field be "Your name This field is required." as FF and Chrome have
it? That is, the accessible name's accumulated text is a combination of the
<label>'s text node (rule 2G), "Your name", and the <abbr>'s @title, "This
field is required.", as per rule 2D?
Otherwise, if the @title on <abbr> is not considered to define the element's
text alternative, does this mean "Your name *" is the correct accessible name,
rule 2D for the text node "Your name" and also for the <abbr> text node "*"?
[1]
http://w3c.github.io/aria/accname-aam/accname-aam.html#mapping_additional_nd_te
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 8 December 2014 01:22:27 UTC