- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:26:11 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26332 --- Comment #69 from Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> --- (In reply to Ryan Sleevi from comment #68) > (In reply to Joe Steele from comment #64) > > Your assumptions seem to be that all DRM protocols are home-grown and not > > based on robust well analyzed protocols. You have not offered any proof of > > this other than your experience. > > The proof is in the very fact that Mark Watson has repeatedly told the W3C > in a variety of forums that the protocols employed CANNOT be discussed in an > open context. > I don't recall saying that even once, never mind repeatedly. It's quite likely I have pointed out the fact that none of the proprietary DRM vendors have published their protools. As Joe points out, this doesn't mean they are not using open standard protocols and open, well-reviewed, implementations, just that we don't know what they are using because they have not told us. However, UA implementors that integrate CDMs may well know these things for the CDMs they integrate and should be able to make their own security decisions on that basis. Furthermore, UA implementors that properly sandbox the CDM will know what kind of identifiers it has access to as well as what it does with them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 22 August 2014 14:26:12 UTC