- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:13:03 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26332 --- Comment #45 from David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> --- (In reply to Mark Watson from comment #44) > (In reply to David Dorwin from comment #43) > > (In reply to Mark Watson from comment #40) > > > (In reply to David Dorwin from comment #36) > > > > > Reiterating what Ryan said, the concern is not necessarily about "rogue > > CDMS", it is about limiting the damage that is possible when exposing a CDM > > that uses permanent identifiers, is not fully sandboxed, etc. > > So why not apply the restriction only to such CDMs ? Why should the > restriction apply to CDMs that do not expose permanent identifiers and/or > are fully sandboxed ? That is essentially possible option 2 in comment #0. As mentioned there and elsewhere, I think relying on such judgement calls will fail in practice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2014 00:13:09 UTC