- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:41:10 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26575 --- Comment #7 from Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> --- (In reply to Domenic Denicola from comment #6) > Yes, you can always add an artificial delay (be it one task, or one second, > or whatever) to allow a grace period before messages are dropped. But this > seems like problematic API design that is better avoided. I wasn't think so much of a "delay" (which implies the possibility of race conditions) as being explicit about the order in which things are placed into the same queue (with an assumption that the queue is FIFO). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:41:11 UTC