- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:23:12 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25003 Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jaffathecake@gmail.com --- Comment #24 from Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com> --- steve faulkner: > The HTML5.0 CR spec is meant to reflect interoperable implementations Ahh ok, but if outlining is dropped, then sectioning elements must also be dropped as they're part of that feature. > we have already had to mitigate such evangelism in regards to use of <section> as a replacement for <div> by changing advice in the HTML spec :-) Then that was incorrect evangelism. It's certainly not what I teach or follow. These kinds of errors will also happen. It happened with tables, it still happens with dl & forms etc etc. > the hunch that the implementation of the outline algo in the acc layer only will be a win for users also needs to be backed up by evidence. Comment 15 shows this, right? Not all ATs will benefit, but some will. And if ATs are struggling with the algorithm, they'll be able to avoid creating a buggy implementation and use the acc layer instead. Also, it paves the way to the dom methods you propose. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2014 13:23:14 UTC