- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 19:18:01 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25003 --- Comment #11 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> --- (In reply to alexander surkov from comment #10) > (In reply to steve faulkner from comment #9) > > (In reply to alexander surkov from comment #8) > > > I didn't. It sounds like complicated issue with no agreement. Do we have > > > some dead lines? > > > > I think it makes sense for the HTML5.0 spec match reality i.e. reflect > > current and expected implementations for the foreseeable future, while the > > 5.1 spec can continue to reflect future, possible implementations. > > as long it's not lost and carefully moved to next spec then I don't mind at > all. > > > Unless > > implementers are going to move on implementing this in the near future, to > > date I have seen no indication. > > > > thoughts? > > agree, I just wouldn't want to lose some good ideas because nobody had a > time to seriously consider them it will remain here: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/dom.html#sec-implicit-aria-semantics just modded here http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/CR/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2014 19:18:03 UTC