[Bug 23341] The extension should not require special (handcuffed) hardware.

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23341

--- Comment #5 from Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> ---
Ok, I have no problem with that statement. However the specification doesn't
mandate the use of software content protection schemes either.

And I think, rather than use the words 'mandate the use of' - because the
specification doesn't 'mandate' anyone to 'use' anything - we should say
whether compliance to the specification requires X, Y, Z. With this wording we
could say

'This specification supports both software and hardware content protection
schemes but does not require either for compliance.'

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2013 22:50:06 UTC