- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 03:45:56 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23113 --- Comment #6 from Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Philip Jägenstedt from comment #5) > In > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2013Sep/0004.html> I > explain why I think it's a bad idea to expose cues which can in principle be > rendered without actually implementing the rendering. > > Note that this is not to say that *metadata* cues which are by design > application-specific shouldn't be exposed, they clearly should be. It's only > things like the SSA in Matroska example that I think are a bad idea. FAICT your only reason to object is that script may rely on rendering SSA by itself even after the browser might have already implemented an interface to render it. I think that's not a TextTrackCue specific problem, but one that applies to all new features of browsers. If the browser exposes such cues as UnparsedCues initially, JS will implement the rendering. Later, the browser supports SSACues and will not expose UnparsedCues any longer, so JS will not kick in. So, this situation doesn't actually create a problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 16 September 2013 03:45:57 UTC