- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 11:18:18 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23116 Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |robin@w3.org Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> --- (In reply to comment #4) > I didn't think of this. Then it is possible to use XHR so it is less needed > for forms. Although, it might be useful for forms too if the above use cases > are rational and sane (they might not be?). EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: none Rationale: It could indeed be interesting in theory, but in practice and as indicated in the message quoted in #1 it would require figuring out the interaction model and how to set some headers along the way. Without those, the addition isn't very useful. In fact, even with those the chances are pretty big that the default interaction won't be what developers want, and people will have to resort to XHR anyway. XHR works well for this, so the need is met. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2013 11:18:20 UTC