- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:04:10 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23589 --- Comment #4 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Anthony from comment #2) > Well, since that is my goal with each of these bugs, definitely. It means we > can remove output from list. I can only hope that getting the other 4-6 > features I'm not wanting to see go off the list could be so easy. > > I filed a bug because I've checked the draft every few days for over a month > and it hasn't changed. My concern is that if someone doesn't advocate for > these features, the assumption will be that they won't be missed, without a > real check on where the feature is in terms of implementation (obviously if > one of the features became the talk of the town, it would survive, but > significant implementation but still low like a jump from 3 - 10% > implementation may not be taken seriously without a bug or a voice acting as > a counter to being on the list in the first place). Hi Anthony I would also note that because a feature is listed (currently) at risk for HTML5 it does not mean that it is/will be removed from the 5.1 spec http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/ and if the feature is interoperably implemented then it will be removed from the list before HTML5 goes to Rec. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 13:04:15 UTC