- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:03:44 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23480 Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hsivonen@hsivonen.fi --- Comment #1 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi> --- I'm strongly opposed to this. xml:id has a high implementation cost--both in browsers and in other apps. I think the HTML spec should avoid any appearance of suggesting that using xml:id or implementing xml:id might be a good idea. (I have actually implemented xml:id in a non-browser app, so I have some implementation experience.) Also, use case starts with "An author with a Web site which follows polyglot markup"... Sigh. Please WONTFIX. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 13:03:50 UTC