- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:03:44 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23480
Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hsivonen@hsivonen.fi
--- Comment #1 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi> ---
I'm strongly opposed to this. xml:id has a high implementation cost--both in
browsers and in other apps. I think the HTML spec should avoid any appearance
of suggesting that using xml:id or implementing xml:id might be a good idea.
(I have actually implemented xml:id in a non-browser app, so I have some
implementation experience.)
Also, use case starts with "An author with a Web site which follows polyglot
markup"... Sigh.
Please WONTFIX.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 13:03:50 UTC