- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 20:22:15 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20967 --- Comment #24 from Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de> --- (In reply to Sam Ruby from comment #23) > The essence of your bug report is that EME is not in scope due to your > interpretation of writings of the W3C that exist entirely outside of the > HTML WG. I do not think that this is a correct representation of this issue. > > I was not aware that Tim Berners-Lee had *already decided* that his final > > acceptance of EME will *not* depend on whether it can be implemented as Open > > Source. Thanks for that important clarification. I trust that you do not > > misrepresent his position. > > I at no time made that statement. Again, I think this is a misunderstanding > by you on the position of W3C management. Understanding the position of the W3C management seems to require a lot of effort. My conclusion now is that it is not well defined. I suppose that the EFF and others did represent the relevant points in the debate with W3C management and therefore do not intend to repeat that effort. But I will try to formulate a question or small set of questions for the W3C management in the hope that the reply will further clarify the position of the W3C. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 20:22:17 UTC