- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 04:38:11 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20967 Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pcotton@microsoft.com --- Comment #19 from Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com> --- (In reply to Andreas Kuckartz from comment #17) > As a result of the discussion on the mailing list of the W3C Restricted > Media Community Group I provide a simple test of formal legal compatibility > with Open Source: > > Can EME be implemented using the GPLv3 or AGPLv3 license ? > > Due to the intended purpose of EME using these licenses also results in > certain requirements which have to be satisfied by the CDMs. First can you please provide a pointer the exact discussion in the Restricted Media CG email discussion where this was discussed? Second can you please explain why a W3C specification has to meet this kind of test? I can find nothing in the W3C Process document or the W3C Patent Policy or any other W3C policy document that says this is true. Third could you please describe a specific change that could be made to the current EME spec that would satisfy your test? /paulc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 04:38:12 UTC