- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 22:12:13 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17682 --- Comment #16 from Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com> --- (In reply to David Dorwin from comment #14) > (In reply to Paul Cotton from comment #13) > > (In reply to David Dorwin from comment #11) > > > 6) The linked IETF document has expired. What is the implication of this? > > ... > > > [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-json-web-key > > > > The content from [2] is now published at: > > > > 1. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-16, and > > 2. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-algorithms-16 > > > > These two drafts are close to working group last call. > > > > We should use one or both of these references instead. > > > > /paulc > > Thanks, Paul. We were using the URLs without the "-##" suffix; these > appeared to redirect to the latest version, but the redirects appear to not > have been updated. Can you verify this is the intent and ask them to update > redirects if so? That way EME will always point at the latest version. Please note that the old URL of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-json-web-key contains "draft-jones" and the URLs I proposed instead contain "draft-ietf". Both http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key and http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-algorithms definitely redirect to the current versions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 22:12:17 UTC