- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:59:39 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22739 --- Comment #17 from Ilya Streltsyn <selenit@mail.by> --- (in reply to Steve Faulkner, comment #16) > I don't think google cares what HTML markup is used for breadcrumbs It uses nesting along with itemprop="child" to express the relation of hierarchy. > Feedback from actual users, so far, does not suggest its misleading I still suppose that considering breadcrumbs as nothing more than just a sort of menu (especially from the software tester's point of view, not from the point of view of a person who searches actual content on the site) is already a result of misleading. Quotations from the page mentioned in comment #8 (http://davidmacd.com/test/breadcrumb.html), e.g. "Having the words spoken out telling the path in short is good", seem to be more important to me. The fact that some breadcrumbs work well as a menu still doesn't mean that they work well as breadcrumbs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 12:59:42 UTC