- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 11:04:25 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22187 --- Comment #4 from Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru> --- I propose to reject this change. 1. The Use Cases and Requirements notes the same contrast Vlad does, in terms I believe are similar. The rest of the document relies on HTML accurately describing what an alt does, which I think is a proper separation of concerns. 2. It is not clear in what sense the description is independent of the image it describes, so I do not believe that it improves clarity. I seriously don't think there is much value in messing with the title, and if there was it would be to change it to use the words "longdesc attribute" The attached version of the document doesn't help convince me. And less so because Search and replace without more careful checking was not a good enough tool to convey your meaning. (By the way if you are going to do that, please *at least* make it clear in the edited version what it represents - leaving stuff for search engines to find and thus for people to read with essentially no context should be done carefully. I believe that's one of the reasons the copyright license of the document does not permit it). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 11:04:30 UTC