[Bug 22195] New: "script element: No role" — it strikes me that <head>, <style>, <script>, <noscript> when scripting is enabled, etc, should probably have aria-hidden=true implied and forced (strong semantic).

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22195

            Bug ID: 22195
           Summary: "script element: No role" — it strikes me that <head>,
                    <style>, <script>, <noscript> when scripting is
                    enabled, etc, should probably have aria-hidden=true
                    implied and forced (strong semantic).
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#tab
                    le-aria-strong
                OS: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec
          Assignee: dave.null@w3.org
          Reporter: faulkner.steve@gmail.com
        QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: contributor@whatwg.org, ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org,
                    public-html-admin@w3.org,
                    public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org
        Depends on: 21428

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #21428 +++

Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#table-aria-strong
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#table-aria-strong

Comment:
"script element:    No role" — it strikes me that <head>, <style>,
<script>, <noscript> when scripting is enabled, etc, should probably have
aria-hidden=true implied and forced (strong semantic).

Posted from: 2620:0:1000:147d:554:229d:92fd:f7b8
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_3) AppleWebKit/537.36
(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.3 Safari/537.36

this appears to be a) wrong or b)redundnant 

review
https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/739ba43e644bb1dd29c873d1b4cefa54fc5bd6c3

and revert in necessary

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2013 07:08:06 UTC