[Bug 22090] feedbck from James Craig part 2

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22090

--- Comment #2 from dmacdona <david100@sympatico.ca> ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Removed hgroup
> 
> Will continue to go through this making appropriate changes in spare time.

Removed
", as per current browser implementations it is required that an explicit
<code>role=checkbox</code> is declared and if so you may use any
<code>aria-*</code> attributes applicable to the <code>checkbox</code> role"

Added <p>It is okay to use aria-valuetext on these, with or without an explicit
role.</p>

Removed <code>role=math</code>

Did the rest of the recommendations, except the last two > Element is
focusable, > Element that is a candidate for constraint validation but… and >
iframe [seemless]
I will look at those next time.


Added role=progressbar to the meter element

I'm not sure if I got the right place for the disabled content note that Craig
is talking about. I'll confirm later... in the meantime, I added it with a big
ADD: and REMOVE: not on each change.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2013 01:43:29 UTC