- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 00:40:00 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21941 --- Comment #15 from dmacdona <david100@sympatico.ca> --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #9) > > …but against ID, which makes no reference to God, or religion (and > > therefore, no need for an alternate god like a Spaghetti monster)... It says > > the world is 4 billion years old, and has all kinds of evolutionary forces > > happening that it seems like everything fits together very well, and this > > seems to indicate that it was designed, and is not random. > > > > It may or may not be the case, but it is a serious theory. > > Correction: ID is not a scientific theory. My post didn't say that it was or wasn't a scientific theory, only that it was a serious theory, and that the greatest minds of history are not limited to silos of observable and non-observable realities. Einstein said "In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Albert_Einstein. However, if ID is *not* a scientific theory, then neither is the assertion that the universe is nothing but random atoms with *no* intelligence behind it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2013 00:40:01 UTC