- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 20:50:02 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21438 Bug ID: 21438 Summary: Relocate the informative NOTE on authoring Best Practices to where it is relevant. Classification: Unclassified Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-html-longdesc-20130312/#l ongdesc OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML Image Description Extension Assignee: chaals@yandex-team.ru Reporter: xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: public-html-admin@w3.org, xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no The following NOTE section does currently occur after 4 pargraphs about how User Agents SHOULD or MAY handle the longdesc attribute: ]] Best practices for full descriptions of images are beyond the scope of this document, but there are many resources available.[[ Please, instead, move the above NOTE so that it occurs ommediately after the following paragraph: ]] Authors should put descriptions within an element which is the target of a fragment link (e.g. longdesc="example.html#description") if a description is only part of the target document. [[ Justification: * The cited NOTE section relates to authoring and should thus occur directly after the normative information on authoring. * It is particulary offputting that the cited NOTE section currently occurs directly after a paragraphs about how User Agents MAY treat invalid longdesc attributes. With the wrong glasses on, this could give the impression that is OK for authors to fill the content of @longdesec with textual content (rather than a URL). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 20:50:05 UTC