- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:54:08 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21333 --- Comment #11 from Michael Thornburgh <mthornbu@adobe.com> --- (In reply to comment #9) > I don't believe this should be a goal for v1. The existing spec is already > particularly taxing for existing media engines and I believe that this will > just add another huge amount of work that isn't really needed right now. I > think this is a "nice to have" not a "must have". If content providers & ad > providers decide not to unify their content, then that is a choice, but like > any choice there are consequences. I feel like we already have allowed much > more change then the current HTML5 spec allows so I think we should wait and > see how the things we've speced out so far pan out before adding something > like this. i think a very common use case will involve ads from ad providers that will be multiplexed video and english-only audio (and no captions), and primary content with separated video and audio, with audio in multiple languages, and caption tracks in multiple languages. video engines would already have to support being reconfigured on the fly under Javascript control. having it be automatic solves the problem once properly, decreases complexity for the JS programmer, and improves the user experience. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 20:54:10 UTC