- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:54:34 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19676 Aaron Colwell <acolwell@chromium.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #19 from Aaron Colwell <acolwell@chromium.org> --- Change committed that clarifies text mentioned in comment 18 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/rev/1e6898152c5b Please keep this bug closed. The main accuracy issues have been address and I think we should wait until we have implementation experience before determining whether further changes in this area are really needed. If an application is really worried about errors introduced by timestampOffset, it can simply author the content with the desired timestamps and not use the timestampOffset mechanism at all. I believe the current mechanism is "good enough" for most practical uses and I think we should wait until issues arise in actual implementations before reopening this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:54:39 UTC