- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:00:40 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21326 Aaron Colwell <acolwell@chromium.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |acolwell@chromium.org --- Comment #1 from Aaron Colwell <acolwell@chromium.org> --- The case where crossfading is not supported is there to handle cases where the UA may not have access to the baseband signal such as harware decoding and or protected content. If an implementation is going to implement the v-fades you suggest it might as well just implement the crossfade since the necessary modifications to the media engine would be similar. At best a non-normative note could be added to this section suggesting fades to 0, but I don't expect implementations to actually do this given that this only would apply to cases where fades to zero were possible and significantly less complex to implement then the actual crossfade. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2013 15:00:45 UTC