- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 20:04:54 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21159 --- Comment #3 from Aaron Colwell <acolwell@chromium.org> --- (In reply to comment #2) > I think the method can be overloaded to accept either an ArrayBuffer or > ArrayBufferView. This is what we've done elsewhere in the platform. > > I'm not precious about the naming but prefer to settle on something sooner > rather than later if we're going to make a change. Ok. How about we just call it appendBuffer() and I'll add the 2 overloads. void appendBuffer(ArrayBuffer) void appendBuffer(ArrayBufferView) That way if we come across some other buffer type we need to add, we can just add the extra overload w/o changing the method name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 4 March 2013 20:04:56 UTC