- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:46:05 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22498
Bug ID: 22498
Summary: Inconsistency in explanation of fragment ID resolving
vs. anchor element specs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: HTML5 spec
Assignee: dave.null@w3.org
Reporter: axl.coding@gmail.com
QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-admin@w3.org,
public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org
In www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/browsers.html#scroll-to-fragid we can
read:
"No decoded fragid: If there is an a element in the DOM that has a name
attribute whose value is exactly equal to fragid (not decoded fragid), then the
first such element in tree order is the indicated part of the document; stop
the algorithm here."
That is inconsistent with anchor specs at
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/text-level-semantics.html#the-a-element
which doesn't define a name attribute for anchor elements.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 20:46:06 UTC