- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:46:05 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22498 Bug ID: 22498 Summary: Inconsistency in explanation of fragment ID resolving vs. anchor element specs Classification: Unclassified Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec Assignee: dave.null@w3.org Reporter: axl.coding@gmail.com QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-admin@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org In www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/browsers.html#scroll-to-fragid we can read: "No decoded fragid: If there is an a element in the DOM that has a name attribute whose value is exactly equal to fragid (not decoded fragid), then the first such element in tree order is the indicated part of the document; stop the algorithm here." That is inconsistent with anchor specs at http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/text-level-semantics.html#the-a-element which doesn't define a name attribute for anchor elements. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 20:46:06 UTC