- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 21:26:29 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22303
Bug ID: 22303
Summary: [editorial] Add "ARIA attributes" subsections to the
"head" of the spec section for each element
Classification: Unclassified
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: HTML5 spec
Assignee: dave.null@w3.org
Reporter: faulkner.steve@gmail.com
QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: faulkner.steve@gmail.com, ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org,
public-html-admin@w3.org,
public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org
Depends on: 21837
Blocks: 21898
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #21837 +++
This is a spec enhancement request.
Please add "ARIA attributes" subsection to the "head" part of the section for
each element; that is, the part that has "Content model", "Content attributes",
"Contexts in which this element can be used", etc., headings.
The "ARIA attributes" subsection for each element should first just include the
statement "Global states and properties", if the ARIA global states and
properties are allowed on that element,
The remainder of the section should be a two-column table or dl/dt/dd list.
The left column of each row of the table, or the <dt> part of the dl/dt/dd
list, should list each value (if any) of the "role" attribute that is allowed
on that element --or "none" if the role attribute is not allowed at all on that
element.
The right column of the table, or the dd part of the dl/dt/dd list, should list
which non-global ARIA states and properties are allowed for the corresponding
role shown in the left column or <dt> for that element.
The rationale for making this enhancement to the spec is that it puts the
information about the allowed ARIA attributes for that element at "point of
use", so that Web author-developers do not need to look elsewhere in the spec
for that information. So it's a usability improvement for readers of the spec.
I would be glad to provide a patch that adds those subsections to the spec.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2013 21:26:31 UTC