- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:03:50 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22245
Bug ID: 22245
Summary: Requirements unclear for "other" metadata names
Classification: Unclassified
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: HTML5 spec
Assignee: dave.null@w3.org
Reporter: robin@w3.org
QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-admin@w3.org,
public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org
In
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/document-metadata.html#the-meta-element,
we have:
"Conformance checkers may use the information given on the WHATWG Wiki
MetaExtensions page to establish if a value is allowed or not" which makes it
sound optional, but followed by "values (...) not listed in either this
specification or on the aforementioned page must be reported as invalid" which
is a strict requirement.
Double-proposal:
- Metadata names not listed in the standard or wiki shouldn't be hard errors;
they seem like warning material.
- Either way, it should be clearly may or must, but not both.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 14:03:52 UTC