- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:03:50 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22245 Bug ID: 22245 Summary: Requirements unclear for "other" metadata names Classification: Unclassified Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec Assignee: dave.null@w3.org Reporter: robin@w3.org QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-admin@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org In http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/document-metadata.html#the-meta-element, we have: "Conformance checkers may use the information given on the WHATWG Wiki MetaExtensions page to establish if a value is allowed or not" which makes it sound optional, but followed by "values (...) not listed in either this specification or on the aforementioned page must be reported as invalid" which is a strict requirement. Double-proposal: - Metadata names not listed in the standard or wiki shouldn't be hard errors; they seem like warning material. - Either way, it should be clearly may or must, but not both. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 14:03:52 UTC