- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 08:44:38 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22586 --- Comment #8 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #6) > Sorry should have said multiple *correctly-associated* labels :) > > I'd prefer to use multiple labels with for="foo" than two different methods > of association; that is, that use case does rely on two different standards > when one would cover it. > > Not saying I haven't used ARIA described-by in production, just that I think > that use case could be simplified. In terms of *html validation* that use > case is questionable as it's ARIA not HTML. I have pinged mike smith who works on the w3c validator to get his take on it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 6 July 2013 08:44:39 UTC